Comments

I Corinthians: Conclusion — 2 Comments

  1. I know of a few mistakes in the King James but will mention one which Bob Enyart did most of a show about. KJ version, Exodus 13:18 says, “But God led the people about, through the way of the wilderness of the Red sea:” The Hebrew used to describe the water is “Yam Suf” which does not include anything about “red” but means “Sea of Reeds” or “Sea of Rushes.” Bob pointed out that there are no reeds or rushes in the Red Sea and that if you follow the Hebrew’s path as described by the Word in order to get to the Red Sea they would have had to turn back almost 180 degrees, travel around the Gulf of Suez within only 50 miles of Cairo and about 300 miles out of their way. But what body water does have reeds and would be exactly in the path of their travels is the Gulf of Aqaba. That’s were the Hebrews crossed, not the Red Sea.

  2. Also, one other thing, God reserves the right to refer to bodies of water as he sees fit (He named them first). The Gulf of Aqaba is a part of the Red Sea. And I agree it is the most likely place of the crossing. Thank you for offering some interesting insight my friend!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>